“BIGLAW"
for their trademark and copyright matters?
Or not so biglaw℠...
Sometimes BIGLAW
is not required for the selection, protection and enforcement of your client or
company’s brand identity. Whether you
are a startup, have just achieved mezzanine financing or are in the leagues of
the midmarket companies, something smaller may be adequate.
Selecting the right referral
If you are a business lawyer, investment banker or
accountant, your referrals need to match the needs of your client. And sometimes the client does not need or
will not benefit from the resources that are associated with big firms.
In selecting a trademark attorney for your client, you might
consider whether the trademark attorney you propose to refer has extensive
prosecution experience, has litigated trademarks, has participated in Trademark
Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, whether the attorney personally has a
network of lawyers outside of the United States for foreign trademark
prosecution, whether there is a depth of
knowledge available, whether the attorney you talk to will personally handle your
trademark portfolio, and whether the attorney participates in professional
activities in his or her field.
Paul D. Supnik is not so BIG LAW. But he has practiced in the areas of
trademark and copyright law in the Beverly Hills “triangle” for over 30
years.
Areas of Practice include:
Trademark
Law
|
Copyright Law
| |||
|
Preliminary injunction proceedings |
Litigation | |||
|
Anti-counterfeit enforcement/defense |
Assignments and recordation | |||
|
Litigation |
Searches | |||
|
Selection and development |
Interpretation of rights | |||
|
Trademark searches and interpretation |
Termination of transfers | |||
|
Federal registration |
Licensing and contract negotiation | |||
|
Foreign registration |
Preliminary injunction proceedings | |||
|
Customs recordation |
Anti-piracy enforcement/defense | |||
|
Oppositions and cancellations |
| |||
|
Counseling on trademark usage |
|
|
|
|
not so biglaw℠